WolcottLynch

Home Resources News ListServ

Publications & Working Papers
 

 

Below is an annotated list of selected publications and working papers by the principals of WolcottLynch.

  • Wolcott, S. K.  (2006, first draft).  College Faculty Handbook:  Steps for Better Thinking.  Introduces Steps for Better Thinking and its theoretical underpinnings, offers suggestions and examples for teaching critical thinking skills, and demonstrates assessment of critical thinking using four rubrics.  For a working draft, send email request to Susan K. Wolcott.
  • Wolcott, S. K.  (2005).  Assessment of critical thinking.  In T. G. Calderon & K. D. Martell (Eds) Assessment of Student Learning in Business Schools: Best Practices Each Step of the Way, Vol 1, No. 1.  AACSB International and Association for Institutional Research (AIR).  Discusses the definition of critical thinking and how the definition relates to assessment design.  Summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of different assessment methods for critical thinking, and presents several examples of assessment rubrics.
  • Eldenburg, L. E. and S. K. Wolcott.  (2005).  Cost Management:  Measuring, Monitoring, and Motivating Performance.  Newark, NJ:  John Wiley & Sons.  Textbook for a junior or master-level cost accounting course.  Steps for Better Thinking is introduced in Chapter 1 and is used throughout the textbook and instructor materials as a teaching and learning tool for development of students' decision making skills.
  • WolcottLynch Associates.  (2003).  Resource and Guidance materials for American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) Educational Competency Assessment Web Site.  New York:  AICPA.  Includes a wide range of guidance documents on assessment and competency development in an accounting education context.  For more information see the Library at  http://eca.aicpaservices.org/ (registration is free) or send email to Susan K. Wolcott.
  • Wolcott, S. K. and C. L. Lynch.  (2002).  Developing Critical Thinking Skills:  The Key to Professional Competencies.  A faculty handbook and tool kit.  Sarasota, FL:  American Accounting Association.  The handbook contained in this tool kit provides detailed guidance for using Steps for Better Thinking in accounting education.  Although it is designed for accounting education, the guidance can easily be adapted to other disciplines.  Includes numerous assessment and assignment examples.
  • Lynch, C. L. & Wolcott, S. K.  (2001).  Helping Your Students Develop Critical Thinking Skills.  IDEA Paper No. 37.  Manhattan, KS:  IDEA Center. This paper provides a brief description of Steps for Better Thinking and its theoretical underpinnings.  A problem with this paper is that it presents an earlier version of the model graphic, and some arrows became clocks in the pdf conversion of the graphic.  Otherwise, this paper is a great introduction.  Available:  http://www.idea.ksu.edu/papers/Idea_Paper_37.pdf
  • Wolcott, S. K., Baril, C. P., Bayes, P. E., Cunningham, B. M., Fordham, D. R., & St. Pierre, E. K.  (2002).  Critical thought on critical thinking research.  Journal of Accounting Education 20, pp. 85-103.  Provides recommendations for future research on critical thinking educational interventions.
  • Rama, D. V., S. Ravenscroft, S. K. Wolcott, and E. Zlotkowski.  (2000).  Service-learning outcomes:  Guidelines for educators and researchers.  Issues in Accounting Education 15(4, November), pp. 657-692.  Comprehensive review of empirical findings on student learning from college service learning.  Includes model and suggestions for future researchers.
  • Wolcott, S. K.  (2000).  A Brief Discussion of Moral Reasoning as Open-Ended Problem Solving.  Explores moral reasoning as a specific type of open-ended problem solving. Click on the link to download in pdf format.
  • Wolcott, S. K., C. P. Baril, and B. Cunningham.  (2000).  Towards a Developmental Approach to Pedagogy in Accounting Education. Report of the 1999-2000 Committee on Pedagogy, Teaching & Curriculum Section, American Accounting Association.  The report motivates a developmental approach to pedagogies and provides an initial investigation of the developmental complexity of competencies contained in the AICPA Core Competency Framework. Click on the link to download in pdf format.
  • Lynch, C. L., J. Carter-Wells, and T. Chambers.  (2000).  Conceptually Linking Outcomes for More Efficient Assessment Plans.  Assessment Update 12(3, May-June), pp. 1-2, 14-15.  Describes process used at Calif. State Univ., Fullerton, to efficiently assess multiple student outcomes using course-based written assignments.
  • Wolcott, S. K. (1999). Developing and Assessing Critical Thinking and Life-Long Learning Skills Through Student Self-Evaluations. Assessment Update 11(4, July-August), pp. 4-5, 16. This paper describes a student self-evaluation form and explains how to use the form in college classrooms. A copy of the self-evaluation form can be downloaded under Educator Resources.
  • Lynch, C. L. and G. E. Huber.  (1998).  Assessing Diverse Student Outcomes More Efficiently:  An Example From Engineering Education.  Click on the link to download in pdf format.
  • Wolcott, S. K.  (1998).  MBA Student Assumptions About Knowledge and Critical Thinking in the Classroom.  This working paper reports data from two sections of an MBA course and provides recommendations for critical thinking development of MBA students. Click on the link to download in pdf format.
  • Wolcott, S. K.  (1997).  Student Assumptions About Knowledge and Critical Thinking in the Accounting Classroom. Explains how students' assumptions about knowledge affect their responses to classroom assignments and describes how professors can use information from the reflective judgment model to work toward improvements in student critical thinking. Click on the link to download in pdf format.
  • Wolcott, S. K., & Lynch, C. L. (1997). Critical thinking in the accounting classroom: A reflective judgment developmental process perspective. Accounting Education: A Journal of Theory, Practice and Research, 2(1), 59-78. Explains the usefulness of the reflective judgment model for coursework design, and describes how to design and evaluate reflective thinking essay assignments.
  • Kitchener, K. S., Lynch, C. L., Fischer, K. W., & Wood, P. K. (1993). Developmental range of reflective judgment: The effect of contextual support and practice on developmental stage. Developmental Psychology, 29, 893-906.  Provides empirical evidence about the effects of support and practice on students' assessed levels of reflective judgment.

For a complete list of publications and working papers, see:


 

Send email to Susan K. Wolcott with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: 02/11/06